Battle area > Community
Double Teaming
Cipher Izanagi:
That's actually a reason I say they want NOTHING to do with it.
"weak level"
I don't like seeing that thrown around at all. I'd rather keep player rankings out of the community, and I just... feel like that's a big issue. Calling someone weak isn't a good way to get them to join the community. What if they're new? Do we call them weak and act like an elitist? We were all new at one point. What's the point of putting others down, when we ourselves were like that at one point?
Aeon:
For me weak level isn't saying they're bad, it's that they're... ignorant. Ignorant meaning they haven't had the chance to learn better options and better strategies.
This sounds pretty bad, doesn't it?
Jai Hearts:
honestly anyone can win with a meta deck just need a bit of luck thats all, so no to rankings.
but this is about the community not who is strong and weak, imagine a bussiness whos workers dont work for em or someone else work. no bussiness keeps noe contracted workers for long and those who do can fall so easly.
there are even teams that let people fight now instead of there own members that are on one team because if the elitist mentality but these people are again on another team. i say whats the point of having a team if not all members are allowed to play but those that play in 20 tbs for 20 different teams can ?
Cipher Izanagi:
Little bit. But I get what you mean. I just... don't want that all thrown around, y'know?
Also pushing it back up since I legitimately want to see how someone intends to enforce this if we go about it:
How do we do it and get each team to agree to it. How to we change the formula and rules for something that's been ingrained in this community for it's entire life, even if it's been looked down on.
Kisaragi Zane:
--- Quote from: Jai Hearts on April 19, 2016, 09:02:12 PM ---
--- Quote from: Zane Kisaragi on April 19, 2016, 08:59:42 PM ---
--- Quote from: Aeon on April 19, 2016, 08:53:29 PM ---No, you missed the point. It wasted Zan's time. He wasn't fighting for anything but for the fact both sides needed someone.
--- End quote ---
I guess since is being brought up..., this would be a great example why double teaming is good. To be honest, it didn't waste my time, but being able to fight both teams and to help/give feedback to a team is one of the pros of it. Was it an inconvience? Maybe, (to me it wasn't because again, I didn't mind, it was fun.) but gotta learn to take lemons and make lemonade, yeah? Plus I know both teams love me.
--- End quote ---
wouldnt this time be better spend training less strong members or recruiting new people. teams arnt here for 24/7 tbs. you can do so much more then just tbing 24/7. even now my team has an event so we arnt just focused on this one act.
--- End quote ---
The situation was moreso that, I was asked to play on the opposite side after playing for one side. It wasn't me being a TB-fiend. In fact, in other teams that I'm on, I don't play too much because I'd rather have others play before me since I have the mentality of "I can always play on Team A, I'll let people on Team B play". The only times that I do play is when asked, lack of members, or if I really want to. Most of the time, I am asked, not saying I am lazy: I honestly just prefer others getting their tbing needs out of the way first.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version