Cardfight!! Vanguard > CF!!V Discussion
BT17 Spoilers and Discussion
''The Diablo'' Blaster:
--- Quote from: lucius on May 20, 2014, 01:41:08 PM ---well i actually do have a Problem with SSSD because if done right you can actually attack your Opponent 3 times in a turn
--- End quote ---
That's still manageable imo. Attacking your opponent twice with +30k power, and 2 criticals and also being unable to use g1's or above, thus no PG or even QW...is way worse.
Lucius:
--- Quote from: Blaster Abyss on May 20, 2014, 01:43:23 PM ---
--- Quote from: lucius on May 20, 2014, 01:41:08 PM ---well i actually do have a Problem with SSSD because if done right you can actually attack your Opponent 3 times in a turn
--- End quote ---
That's still manageable imo. Attacking your opponent twice with +30k power, and 2 criticals and also being unable to use g1's or above, thus no PG or even QW...is way worse.
--- End quote ---
lol so true, DP and NG are always having completely broken Card effects, but well as Long as they won't become far too broken it is ok.
''The Diablo'' Blaster:
--- Quote from: lucius on May 20, 2014, 01:51:11 PM ---
--- Quote from: Blaster Abyss on May 20, 2014, 01:43:23 PM ---
--- Quote from: lucius on May 20, 2014, 01:41:08 PM ---well i actually do have a Problem with SSSD because if done right you can actually attack your Opponent 3 times in a turn
--- End quote ---
That's still manageable imo. Attacking your opponent twice with +30k power, and 2 criticals and also being unable to use g1's or above, thus no PG or even QW...is way worse.
--- End quote ---
lol so true, DP and NG are always having completely broken Card effects, but well as Long as they won't become far too broken it is ok.
--- End quote ---
Yeah true. Hence why I think those 2 combos need a restriction.
Lucius:
--- Quote from: Blaster Abyss on May 20, 2014, 01:53:02 PM ---
--- Quote from: lucius on May 20, 2014, 01:51:11 PM ---
--- Quote from: Blaster Abyss on May 20, 2014, 01:43:23 PM ---
--- Quote from: lucius on May 20, 2014, 01:41:08 PM ---well i actually do have a Problem with SSSD because if done right you can actually attack your Opponent 3 times in a turn
--- End quote ---
That's still manageable imo. Attacking your opponent twice with +30k power, and 2 criticals and also being unable to use g1's or above, thus no PG or even QW...is way worse.
--- End quote ---
lol so true, DP and NG are always having completely broken Card effects, but well as Long as they won't become far too broken it is ok.
--- End quote ---
Yeah true. Hence why I think those 2 combos need a restriction.
--- End quote ---
like: 'You may not use BR Units with Legion Units in one deck' right?
''The Diablo'' Blaster:
--- Quote from: lucius on May 20, 2014, 01:58:43 PM ---
--- Quote from: Blaster Abyss on May 20, 2014, 01:53:02 PM ---
--- Quote from: lucius on May 20, 2014, 01:51:11 PM ---
--- Quote from: Blaster Abyss on May 20, 2014, 01:43:23 PM ---
--- Quote from: lucius on May 20, 2014, 01:41:08 PM ---well i actually do have a Problem with SSSD because if done right you can actually attack your Opponent 3 times in a turn
--- End quote ---
That's still manageable imo. Attacking your opponent twice with +30k power, and 2 criticals and also being unable to use g1's or above, thus no PG or even QW...is way worse.
--- End quote ---
lol so true, DP and NG are always having completely broken Card effects, but well as Long as they won't become far too broken it is ok.
--- End quote ---
Yeah true. Hence why I think those 2 combos need a restriction.
--- End quote ---
like: 'You may not use BR Units with Legion Units in one deck' right?
--- End quote ---
It's not Daikaiser the problem in the DP one. It's laurel. It's laurel who needs a restriction at least.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version