Battle area > Deck Discussion

[Narukami] Eradicator, Sweep Command Dragon

<< < (3/3)

Ren «Я»:

--- Quote from: Lance Korilum on May 16, 2014, 07:14:19 PM ---
--- Quote from: [T.A] Ren [R] on May 16, 2014, 06:35:57 PM ---
--- Quote from: Lance Korilum on May 16, 2014, 03:59:36 PM ---
--- Quote from: Chronos Phoenix on May 16, 2014, 02:41:11 AM ---
--- Quote from: [T.A] Ren [R] on May 15, 2014, 06:16:00 PM ---Looks legit but i have a few tips for u if u wanna try em out.
For your grade 0's id run
4 stands -
Brawler of Battles, Haoka(Skill - [AUTO]:[Retire this unit] During your turn, when your opponent's rear-guard in the front row is put into the drop zone, you may pay the cost. If you do, choose up to one of your opponent's rear-guards in the same column as that unit, and retire it. )
Why would i use that because it doesnt say retire lol. meaning u can attack a front row unit with a rear guard, then retire that stand from field aka boost something with the stand to atk a rg. or when a rg is retire in general from front row sets off Sieve but the interesting thing about that is u can atk with vg then hit a rg with um lets say spark rain for exmp then retire stand to nuke the backrow then u can set off
Eradicator, First Thunder Dracokid
so if u get sieve in top 10 u can superior ride during teh battle phase which gives u a double twin drive.

for your grade 1's I'd highly recomend running 4 of Certain Kill Eradicator, Ouei (Human) sets off Sieve's LB as well as in general nuking a front row rg
i get why u run Eradicator of the Ceremonial Bonfire, Castor tho but id use 2 10k boosters but its not needed but helps i guess.

for your grade 2's
ill tel u mine since its pretty decent
2-Supreme Army Eradicator, Zuitan (Human) unflips dmg for u
2-Fiendish Sword Eradicator, Cho-Ou (Demon) obv why cause nuking front row lol and if stand trigger on field at that time u can nuke the backrow as well ol
3- Eradicator, Lorentz Force Dragon (Thunder Dragon)  cause retiring a rg for a cb1 is def worth it lol.
and 4 Spark Rain cause 12k atker and used with stands is decent
and Grade 3's
2 Shaper cause dat br skill so easy to set off and
2 Ignition which sets off Sieve
and 4 sieve's ofc lol

that's my build. maybe those tips etc would help u but if not its ok lol.

--- End quote ---

Once again, I don't run Chouou because I need to retire a unit behind the Vanguard Circle for my Special Combo to go off.
I'm not reducing the number of Shaper, too good
If I use Ignition they will retire BOTH front rows and I'l be left with nothing to set off Sweep with.

Zuitan I've considered running instead of Thunderboom.
Lorentz force is a no, I don't want my opponent choosing what disappears.

--- End quote ---

You're wrong about Ignition .-.  Just resolve Sweep Command's On-ride and LB before resolving Ignition.  Although, Electric Shaper still works way better with Sweep.  Also....  Your deck relies way too much on that one turn.  You leave yourself with next to nothing after that, which really weakens Sweep Command.  Retiring that 5th card really isn't too big of a deal, and Lorentz is still cheaper.  You can't guarantee your Superior Ride, either.  If you don't get Sweep in that top 10, you just shut your entire deck down.  It'd be way better for the deck to use Lorentz or ChouOu in place of Deathscythe, as that will allow you to retire stuff even after your Breakride turn.  If you plan on finishing them off Breakride turn, then the draw from Sweep Command is useless, and Tempest Bolt would be a better choice.  If you don't, then you should give yourself the ability to retire consistently even after the Breakride turn.  Sure, having the Superior Ride is nice, but it's far from necessary for Sweep Command.  If you actually use Sweep Command Dragon properly, Lorentz is fine.  You're opponent won't have a choice as Sweep Command's skill should leave them with only one to choose.

--- End quote ---

Are you talking about the build that i told him that i use or the build that the person who posted this thread or w/e made because I understand 100% what u mean by if u meant my sieve deck it only lose 2x outa like averaged 15-18 cfs that i used it in.

--- End quote ---

I wasn't talking about your deck.  Although it's not what I'd use, it at least is useful for more than just a single turn.  I was talking about the deck in the original post.

--- End quote ---
Oh okay and yeah no deck's perfectly built so i see what u mean by its not what id use". i just teched in those stands for that simple cost skill of atking a rg during battle phase *id boost that unit with that stand * then atk hits retire stand boom there goes the backrow llolollo then u can LB with Sieve to nuke other front row draw a card gain 5k then atk with vg lol in middle of battle phase lol. but the deck build i use it build to set off combos not built for 1 op combo of getting off that starter and breakriding 2x in 1 battle phase. if u do the whole "shaper over itself then starter then seive" well after u nuke a column with chou or soemthing or retire soemthing in general

Prime Ddraig:
Righto, I'l make the changes

ヤタ:
That combo is still 1 turn only and it relies on hitting Sweep in the top ten, which is inconsistent still. If it were me, I would -1 Zuitan, Spark and Deathscythe (or even not Zuitan and 2 Deathscythe or Spark Rain) for 3 Chouou to consistently be able to retire without needing the Vanguard.

NextGenNick:
take out 2 death scyth and throw in 2 cho'o and its quite similar to something I'd run, good solid deck

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page