Cardfight!! Vanguard > CF!!V Discussion

Restrictive or Non-Restrictive?

(1/3) > >>

Sandy:
With all these new cards popping up that are unbound to a certain clan by whatever their effects read (see Anemone Musketeer, Susanna), cards without the Lord ability and so on, more and more folks are talking about mixing decks, using specific cards in their main clan's deck and etc. Now I'm just wondering what everyone here thinks? You like it? You dislike it? You want to mix all the decks all the time? Or do you rather consider yourself a purist and want to keep your decks made up only of a single clan?

Me personally, I'm a purist, I like things simple and the idea of a single clan fighting together that is all apart of the same archetype or from the same background just suits me better.

Magus TSS:
I like keeping my decks to the original clan but I believe there also nothing wrong with mixing ether.

ヤタ:
I think I'm gonna have fun with Susanna in Minerva when I get round to it, so I'm a non-purist I guess o3o"

Sandy:

--- Quote from: ヤタ on May 21, 2014, 05:31:37 PM ---I think I'm gonna have fun with Susanna in Minerva when I get round to it, so I'm a non-purist I guess o3o"

--- End quote ---
BURN THE NON PURIST! lol, though seriously could you come over and look at this fireplace, I think somethings wrong with it? *puppy eyes* :D

HunterSerge:
I love the new possibilities and the creative potential that it opens up. Mixed decks haven't gotten much of anything useful since maybe Season 2. Now almost every card is a potential new tool in their arsenal. Also, I think decks like Glendios, Halcium, and MLB very much appreciate the new Seeker Perfect Guard, with its lack of clan restrictions. The Clan Restrictionless Quintet Walls are a godsend to every rush deck ever.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page