Cardfight!! Vanguard > CF!!V Discussion

Restrictive or Non-Restrictive?

<< < (2/3) > >>

[ER] Patrickzzz:
Well i played vanguard from set 1 and i played yugioh before that. The one thing i didn't like about vanguard is that at first, unlike yugioh, since it was a new game there weren't lots of options and varieties on the first sets. We've come a long way from that and that isn't the case anymore. But something else happened, that is the fact that despite the options many people choose to play the same deck all the time(Like Metalborgs currently). But mixing decks with the new cards creates varieties and possibilities, and i like that. I'm not quite the guy to mix clans myself, but i'm still glad that this is happening, at least it gives me more chances to see my opponents with unusual decks.

Rikkudo Ren Sama:
I also created a thread about this. It is rather disappointing. Maybe Bushiroad forgot the restrictions. Legion clans now have access to the specialties of other clans like retiring for Naru and standing for NG. I'm also a purist, I don't praise mixing decks lol. The essence of their respective clans don't matter anymore, lol.

Lance Korilum:
I'm mainly going to stick to mono-clan decks.  To me, there's no real problem with multi-clanning, I just think it's...  Well, I'm not really sure.  I just prefer single-clan decks.  Unless it's Paladins.  I mix those guys every now and again.

Rikkudo Ren Sama:
Paladins are a special exception with mix clanning. Hehe  ;D

UnknownKIRA:
Personally I really like the release of clan restrictions xD

They allow more interesting deck creation and gives some clans what they don't have to help them improve. Though this could maybe lead into something bad where everyone uses the same cards, that is the only thing I worry about.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page