Area Forum

Battle area => Community => Deck Discussion => Topic started by: ki,ee21 on June 16, 2014, 06:57:51 AM

Title: [Oracle Think Tank] CEO comeback
Post by: ki,ee21 on June 16, 2014, 06:57:51 AM
Grades 0

FV Little witch, LuLu
4x pyschic bird(crt)
4x Blattle sister, Ginger(crt)
4x Victory Maker(draw)
4x Lozenge Magus(heal)

Grades 1

4x Tetra Magus
3x Weather forecaster, Miss mist
3x Luck Bird
4x Oracel guardian, Gemini

Grades 2

2x Silent tomb
3x Maiden of libra
3x Blue scale deer
4x Oracle guardian, Wiseman

Grades 3

4x Goddess of the Treasure Mirror, Oohirume
3x CEO Amaterasu

well, i think the wost wierd thing may be the spam of the vanilla units, but they are they to make a "good" early game since i dont have a forerunner.
Being second with this deck lets you make legion at the turn you ride a Oohirume.

The megablast dont enter in the plan of the deck,but if its need you can aim for it, the plan is spam the units that make you draw, since oohirume gives both soul and open damage

i think maybe stellar magus may be a good add for the deck, but the deck already works pretty nicely
Title: Re: [Oracle Think Tank] CEO comeback
Post by: Mewsic on June 16, 2014, 12:47:38 PM
I would say to change wisemans to 11k-12k attackers because considering your using Lulu and Luck Bird, it's gonna be difficult hitting those magic numbers.

(Unless you plan on calling Oohirume, but I would guess you would rather have those in the deck to be able to draw)

(Retiring them is another option, but that's so wasteful anyways)
Title: Re: [Oracle Think Tank] CEO comeback
Post by: [ER] Patrickzzz on June 16, 2014, 05:37:51 PM
I would say to change wisemans to 11k-12k attackers because considering your using Lulu and Luck Bird, it's gonna be difficult hitting those magic numbers.

(Unless you plan on calling Oohirume, but I would guess you would rather have those in the deck to be able to draw)

(Retiring them is another option, but that's so wasteful anyways)

I agree, and i also think that the blue scale deer is not really necessary.
Title: Re: [Oracle Think Tank] CEO comeback
Post by: Mewsic on June 16, 2014, 06:45:36 PM
I would say to change wisemans to 11k-12k attackers because considering your using Lulu and Luck Bird, it's gonna be difficult hitting those magic numbers.

(Unless you plan on calling Oohirume, but I would guess you would rather have those in the deck to be able to draw)

(Retiring them is another option, but that's so wasteful anyways)

I agree, and i also think that the blue scale deer is not really necessary.

Especially when so many of your cards rely on having gemini as a support like like Silent Tom.
Title: Re: [Oracle Think Tank] CEO comeback
Post by: BlueDragonz on July 04, 2014, 10:12:50 AM
if you are going to have a lot of cards in your hand it might be better to add cards like:
grade1:Battle sister maple, weather girl milk
grade2:Battle sister mocha, onmyoji of the moonlit night, sword dancer angel
adding these cards would allow drawing more cards to be more useful
i recommend exchanging 3 gemini or so for a maple and milk, some wiseman for any of the g 2 cards i listed
and personally i like battle sister eclair better than lulu since both give you a draw
you could also add milk as good support.
The effects of the cards i listed are pretty easy to achieve especially if your deck is more of a "draw" type

But still this is just only my own recommendation you could choose to ignore it :)
Title: Re: [Oracle Think Tank] CEO comeback
Post by: ヤタ on July 04, 2014, 03:48:08 PM
....but using those cards means you make crappy columns most of the time D:
The only card that should really be considering is 4 Susanoo to replace the 4 Wiseman, and getting rid of the Blue Scale Deer for more Tom and Libra, and I'd be using Stellar Magus over Libra anyway, considering if you fail to declare the right card with Oohirume, in the rare occasion of that happening, you can draw it instead. Also, who doesn't like random plussing? :P
Title: Re: [Oracle Think Tank] CEO comeback
Post by: BlueDragonz on July 04, 2014, 10:08:00 PM
....but using those cards means you make crappy columns most of the time D:
The only card that should really be considering is 4 Susanoo to replace the 4 Wiseman, and getting rid of the Blue Scale Deer for more Tom and Libra, and I'd be using Stellar Magus over Libra anyway, considering if you fail to declare the right card with Oohirume, in the rare occasion of that happening, you can draw it instead. Also, who doesn't like random plussing? :P
True. I forgot about susanoos skill since i've only ever used the battle sisters when using OTT. the blue scale deer should be removed and i agree of replacing it for tom and libra. but there is a limit to the cbs so yea i highly recommend him/her to add in stellar magus in the deck :D
Title: Re: [Oracle Think Tank] CEO comeback
Post by: Mewsic on July 09, 2014, 01:16:08 AM
....but using those cards means you make crappy columns most of the time D:
The only card that should really be considering is 4 Susanoo to replace the 4 Wiseman, and getting rid of the Blue Scale Deer for more Tom and Libra, and I'd be using Stellar Magus over Libra anyway, considering if you fail to declare the right card with Oohirume, in the rare occasion of that happening, you can draw it instead. Also, who doesn't like random plussing? :P


Usually I would use Libra over Stellar Magus because of the pressure. Even if you gain a card through Stellar Magus, Libra applies two jobs of either getting a free draw, or guarding more in of your opponents hand. Then again it probably just comes down to preference (pressure or a sure +1) . Also there's not such thing on a limit of counter blasts, you can just use Oohirume to Unflip the damage again.
Title: Re: [Oracle Think Tank] CEO comeback
Post by: Hideyoshi on July 10, 2014, 05:24:39 AM
someone ask kira to come here.. this deck needs a do-over  :o
Title: Re: [Oracle Think Tank] CEO comeback
Post by: Mewsic on July 10, 2014, 11:35:20 AM
No offense, but that's just rude...

Who said they even have a similar playstyle.