Legion or Limit Break

[Lance Korilum]

The title is pretty self-explanatory.  Do you prefer Legion or Limit Break, and why?

I personally prefer Limit Break.  Saying "Limit Break" sounds better than saying "Legion Skill" to me, and I'm a fan of the concept of Limit Breaks in general.  The limiting to Late game doesn't bother me too much, and I just like the units that have Limit Break better than most of the units that have Legion.  I also have beat Legion on multiple occasions with Limit Break decks, though that might just be the users of the Legions.  Also, my third most hated unit to ever exist is a Legion....  Freaking Sin Buster >_>

[FTLol]

I prefer Legion simply because LB feels too automated for me.

[Sahasi]

Legion, since you can use it early in game.

[Magus TSS]

Yea I would prefer Legion over Limit Break myself. If I had a Legion in my own clan. Limit Break is too slow in most cases.

[[MK Hunter] E.T]

Legion or Limit Break, that is a good question.
I have used Legion, and the worst form of it, for the opponent at least, Mr Sin Buster. Yes I can say it is good, easy and fast. Guard early and you will have 4 units in Drop Zone in order to "Seek Mato". Also Quintet Walls are quite useful making top 5 guard, then drop, then recycle back to deck to activate Legion skill. From that point of of view Legion---Mate is better.

But I still prefer Limit Break. As it is already said, I prefer declearing "Limito Breaku!" than "Seek Mato" and "Legion". Limit Break and furthermore Ultimate Break are skills used in late game. That means that you have to wait to have 4 damages which is kinda slow. But Limit Break can help you to turn around your game gaining a good skill which, except form giving advantage, it can "Final Taan" your opponent.

P.S.: If Break Ride is inside this comparison of Limit Break and Legion, I would be neutral.

[Magus TSS]

P.S.: If Break Ride is inside this comparison of Limit Break and Legion, I would be neutral.

Breakrides are Limit Breaks they count as the same thing.

 A part of me wants to take my original answer back simply because of how Breakride and Legion can work together in some cases but my original reason still stands in the mix case that going for the Limit Break is slower. I still think on their own Legion is far better for all the things it can do depending on the deck.

Also this thread should have a poll so we can get a idea of where the fourm stands.

[[ER] Patrickzzz]

Well i agree that LB is too automatic, that's why i'm glad legion was released, but i prefer LB. Not because is automatic, but because it has mroe options, so far there are no legion units that makes me say "This will be my ace" and there are lots of LB units that i like. This may change in the future tho.

[dcdfvr]

I'd use both and work with what i have to win from there. If you guarded properly or played correctly they should both be active near the same time anyways

[Sendo]

I'd say Legion. Mainly because you can use it early, but I pretty much like the idea of having 2 Vanguards. Even if it goes against that concept of being "inside" the Vanguard.
Still like Limit Break, though. Like said above, it's nicer to say and all~

[Raien D. End]

i prefer legion cause i dont have to wait for 4 damage to use skill

[Lucius]

I prefer Limit Break because i am not very good in handling Legions but once the Liberator Legion Comes out i will use both i guess

[Ren «Я»]

The title is pretty self-explanatory.  Do you prefer Legion or Limit Break, and why?

I personally prefer Limit Break.  Saying "Limit Break" sounds better than saying "Legion Skill" to me, and I'm a fan of the concept of Limit Breaks in general.  The limiting to Late game doesn't bother me too much, and I just like the units that have Limit Break better than most of the units that have Legion.  I also have beat Legion on multiple occasions with Limit Break decks, though that might just be the users of the Legions.  Also, my third most hated unit to ever exist is a Legion....  Freaking Sin Buster >_>

Yeah I find Limit Breaks to be better because of the reason that legions dont require any damage making it easier to use meaning less skill involved. that's just my opinion though but I find both to be good.

[''The Diablo'' Blaster]

Legion or Limit Break huh... Good question. I don't really know which one I prefer. The 2 are completely different. Limit Break is meant to be used late game and win, or turn the tide of a fight. Legion on the other hand, can be used early game, especially if you use QW as someone mentioned already, which means you can really pressure your opponent. I prefer saying ''Limit Break'' rather than ''Legion'' or ''Seek mate'' myself, but I don't think what you declare when activating some kind of skill should affect which one you find better or prefer. I personally believe you should state your opinion on the skills. Plus, Legion seems kinda powerfull right now,especially for some clans, because not every clan has it yet.

[Ren «Я»]

Legion or Limit Break huh... Good question. I don't really know which one I prefer. The 2 are completely different. Limit Break is meant to be used late game and win, or turn the tide of a fight. Legion on the other hand, can be used early game, especially if you use QW as someone mentioned already, which means you can really pressure your opponent. I prefer saying ''Limit Break'' rather than ''Legion'' or ''Seek mate'' myself, but I don't think what you declare when activating some kind of skill should affect which one you find better or prefer. I personally believe you should state your opinion on the skills. Plus, Legion seems kinda powerfull right now,especially for some clans, because not every clan has it yet.

Yeah i have a feeling seekers/metalborg etc are gonna be less used once the new ones come out lol. seekers strategy is obv and metalborg yeah same lol. at least with brawlers etc u can totally whreck there field and musketeers can reswarm with ease so glad imnot seeing as many seeker/metalborg users lol.

[''The Diablo'' Blaster]

Legion or Limit Break huh... Good question. I don't really know which one I prefer. The 2 are completely different. Limit Break is meant to be used late game and win, or turn the tide of a fight. Legion on the other hand, can be used early game, especially if you use QW as someone mentioned already, which means you can really pressure your opponent. I prefer saying ''Limit Break'' rather than ''Legion'' or ''Seek mate'' myself, but I don't think what you declare when activating some kind of skill should affect which one you find better or prefer. I personally believe you should state your opinion on the skills. Plus, Legion seems kinda powerfull right now,especially for some clans, because not every clan has it yet.

Yeah i have a feeling seekers/metalborg etc are gonna be less used once the new ones come out lol. seekers strategy is obv and metalborg yeah same lol. at least with brawlers etc u can totally whreck there field and musketeers can reswarm with ease so glad imnot seeing as many seeker/metalborg users lol.

Indeed. Personally, I believe Metalborgs are topping from the clans that have legion...Daikaiser + Uru Buster + laurel is to damn mainstream and annoying...They keep doing that..you can't guard with g1 or above..so no null or QW...it has 2 criticals..if you guard with alot of g0's and they get g3 they retire your guardians...and then they stand to attack again...I really think that needs a restriction...